A Translation Competence-Based Approach to Machine Translation Post-Editing Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2026600Palabras clave:
curriculum design, machine translation, post-editing, translator education, translation competenceResumen
Introduction: This study examined the role of machine translation post-editing within the language service industry, where it had become the dominant workflow alongside continued challenges in translator training systems. Grounded in the PACTE translation competence model, the study addressed limitations in pragmatic accuracy and cultural adequacy in machine translation output by designing a three-stage, competence-oriented post-editing training program. Methodology: A conceptual and theory-driven methodology was adopted, without empirical data collection. A modular curriculum was developed, integrating theoretical instruction, case-based analysis, and project-based practice. In addition, an assessment framework combining formative and summative evaluation was proposed to support learner development and performance measurement. Results: The findings indicated that the structured three-stage model could enhance learners’ ability to detect and correct pragmatic errors, while strategic sub-competence played a central coordinating role in skill development. Project-based learning was also found to foster critical thinking and improve alignment with market demands. The proposed 60/40 balance between formative and summative assessment further supported both learning processes and outcome quality. Conclusions: The study concluded that the translation competence framework provided a viable basis for post-editing training design and curriculum reform.
Citas
Alibaba Cloud. (2025). What is machine translation? https://cn.aliyun.com/getting-started/what-is/what-is-machine-translation?from_alibabacloud=
Beeby, A., Fernández, M., Fox, O., Albir, A., Kozlova, I., Kuznik, A., Neunzig, W., Rodríguez, P., Romero, L., & Wimmer, S. (2009). Results of the validation of the PACTE translation competence model: Acceptability and decision making. Across Languages and Cultures, 10(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.3
Chen, Y., & Pan, L. (2023). Research on machine translation post-editing course design: An analysis based on demand, competence and content elements. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Engineering, 44(4), 121–124. https://oversea.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=tVGN6Um245qhTYwgJmNNiKdW-YyBulJ8OCB22og6JeQFVjmLDxFKtwNW15nMzeqUrtwncPtQfQr0W7HzJElwwSuiMQ_fpLJw6cDdBRlNgrXT2eHz6Qs9iLK6nkhDCxOZB4HcQ3U563Hgs-mX6BPlH7_nAe2qDxUag7PC6qEHwc8=&uniplatform=OVERSEA&language=CHS
Çeti̇Ner, C., & İşisağ, K. (2019). Undergraduate Level Translation Students’ Attitudes towards Machine Translation Post-Editing Training. International Journal of Languages’ Education, 7(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.3242
Cui, Q., & Li, W. (2015). Research on post-editing error types: Based on English-Chinese machine translation of scientific and technical texts. Chinese Science and Technology Translators Journal, 28(4), 19–22. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2668151
Dimitriu, R. (2015). The Many Contexts of Translation (Studies). Linguaculture, 2015(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/lincu-2015-0033
Elbaz, P. (2025). Quelle place et quelle modalité de relation aux experts dans un contexte d’apprentissage de la terminologie en master de traduction ? Syn-Thèses, 46-59 Pages. https://doi.org/10.26262/ST.V0I16.10651
Feng, Q., & Zhang, H. (2015). Research on post-editor cultivation in the context of global language service industry. Foreign Language World, (1), 65–72.
Gao, B., & Hu, P. (2024). Comparative study of translation competence market demand and MTI curriculum design in China. Chinese Translators Journal, 45(1), 108–116. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380359251_woguofanyinenglishichangxuqiuyuMTIkechengshezhiduibiyanjiuzhongguofanyi?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7InBhZ2UiOiJzY2llbnRpZmljQ29udHJpYnV0aW9ucyIsInByZXZpb3VzUGFnZSI6bnVsbH19
Göpferich, S., & Jääskeläinen, R. (2009). Process research into the development of translation competence: Where are we, and where do we need to go? Across Languages and Cultures, 10(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.1
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (2008). Machine translation: A new era of human-machine symbiotic translation. https://ia.cas.cn/kxcb/kpwz/200804/t20080414_2299218.html
Jia, Y., Carl, M., & Wang, X. (2019). Post-editing neural machine translation versus phrase-based machine translation for English–Chinese. Machine Translation, 33(1–2), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-019-09229-6
Jones, E. R. (2025). Pragmatics. The Decision Lab. https://thedecisionlab.com/reference-guide/linguistics/pragmatics
Koponen, M. (2016). Is machine translation post-editing worth the effort? A survey of research into post-editing and effort. The Journal of Specialised Translation, (25), 131–148. https://jostrans.soap2.ch/issue25/art_koponen.pdf
Krüger, R. (2016). Situated LSP Translation from a Cognitive Translational Perspective. Lebende Sprachen, 61(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/les-2016-0014
Li, X., & Gao, C. (2024). Knowledge map and development trends of foreign machine translation research. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 175(2), 41–47. https://shjot2021.shu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract405.shtml
National Education Examinations Authority & National Language Commission. (2018). China's standards of English language ability (GF 0018-2018).
O’Brien, S. (2002). Teaching post-editing: A proposal for course content. Proceedings of the 6th EAMT workshop: Teaching machine translation. https://aclanthology.org/2002.eamt-1.11.pdf
PACTE. (2008). Building a translation competence model. In F. Alves (Ed.), Benjamins Translation Library (Vol. 45, pp. 43–66). John Benjamins.
Pym, A. (2004). Redefining Translation Competence in an Electronic Age. In Defence of a Minimalist Approach. Meta, 48(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.7202/008533ar
Shi, Q. (2023). Development of post-editing skills in machine translation. Region - Educational Research and Reviews, 5(3), 125. https://doi.org/10.32629/rerr.v5i3.1325
Su, W., & Li, D. (2023). The effectiveness of translation technology training: A mixed methods study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 595. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02066-2
Vieira, L. N. (2014). Indices of cognitive effort in machine translation post-editing. Machine Translation, 28(3–4), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-014-9156-x
Wang, C. (2023). Subtitle translation research of How to Get Away with Murder under "machine translation + post-editing" mode. Overseas English, (23), 11–13. http://overseaen.net/html/zzgg/index_2.asp
Wang, Y., & Jalalian Daghigh, A. (2023). Cognitive effort in human translation and machine translation post-editing processes: A holistic and phased view. FORUM. Revue Internationale d’interprétation et de Traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation, 21(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.22009.wan
Zhong, W., & Shu, C. (2020). Post-editing competence structure and curriculum design: Based on frontier analysis of foreign post-editing courses. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (6), 86–91. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7104173319
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Xiang Zhang

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Este artículo se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative CommonsReconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. A menos que se indique lo contrario, el material publicado asociado se distribuye bajo la misma licencia.


