El desarrollo de la ciudadanía en los adolescentes: la lucha entre la influencia de la familia, el grupo de pares y la escuela pública

Luis Antonio Ramírez Montes

doi:10.58763/rc2024251

Authors

Luis Antonio Ramírez Montes Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Iztapalapa, México https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9125-1452

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024251

Keywords:

Citizenship, basic education, citizenship education, public education, socialization

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to show that the differences in the social context in which adolescents live and study, as well as the people with whom they interact, exert different types of influence on their thinking, among other things, about the importance of citizenship, their stance on reporting a crime or abuse, and the reasons for voting for a political party or candidate. To collect the data, a questionnaire of "citizen opinions and attitudes" was designed with multiple-choice answers with a Likert-type scale, which inquires about some topics that arise from the concept of citizenship and are developed during the secondary level of public education in Mexico. A sample of 323 adolescents attending the three secondary school grades at the end of the 2021-2022 school year was studied. The case studies consisted of two public schools of the general modality, which had different academic grades and levels of marginalization. The results showed that the characteristics of the social context and the socializing agents with whom the students lived encouraged ways of thinking that were opposed to the citizenship competencies sought by the educational institution.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anjaria, K. (2022). Knowledge derivation from Likert scale using Z-numbers. Information Sciences, 590, 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.01.024

Aristeidou, M., Herodotou, C., Ballard, H., Young, A., Miller, A., Higgins, L., y Johnson, R. (2021). Exploring the participation of young citizen scientists in scientific research: The case of iNaturalist. Plos one, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245682

Bañales, J., Hope, E., Rowley, S., y Cryer-Coupet, Q. (2021). Raising justice-minded youth: Parental ethnic-racial and political socialization and Black youth's critical consciousness. Journal of Social Issues, 77(4), 964-986. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12486

Bedock, C., y Pilet, J. (2020). Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens. Government and Opposition, 56(3), 485 - 504. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2020.1

Berger, P., y Luckmann, T. (2003). La construcción social de la realidad. Amorrortu.

Bourdieu, P. (2007). El sentido práctico. Siglo XXI Editores.

Buchholz, B., DeHart, J., y Moorman, G. (2020). Digital Citizenship During a Global Pandemic: Moving Beyond Digital Literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1076

Chiba, M., Sustarsic, M., Perriton, S., y Edwards Jr., D. (2021). Investigating effective teaching and learning for sustainable development and global citizenship: Implications from a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Development, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102337

Cortés-Cediel, M., Cantador, I., y Bolívar, M. (2021). Analyzing Citizen Participation and Engagement in European Smart Cities. Social Science Computer Review, 39(4), 592-626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319877478

Durkheim, E. (2003). Educación y Sociología. Ediciones Península.

Esau, M., Rondganger, C., y Roman, N. (2019). Family Political Socialisation and its Effect on Youth Trust in Government: A South African Perspective. Politikon, 46(1), 122-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2018.1525927

Estellés, M., y Fischman, G. (2021). Who Needs Global Citizenship Education? A Review of the Literature on Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(2), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120920254

Ghosn-Chelala, M. (2020). Global citizenship education in conflict-affected settings: Implications of teachers’ views and contextual challenges for the Lebanese. case. Teaching and Teacher Education, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103078

Hickey, A., y Pauli-Myler, T. (2019). The constraints of youth: young people, active citizenship and the experience of marginalisation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(3), 372-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1351920

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2021) Promedio de escolaridad de la población de 15 años y más de acuerdo con el Censo de Población y vivienda 2020. México: Comunicado de prensa no. 24/21. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2021/EstSociodemo/ResultCenso2020_Nal.pdf

Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE), Colegio de México (COLMEX). (2015). Informe País sobre la Calidad de la Ciudadanía en México, México.

Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación (INEE). (2019). La educación obligatoria en México. Informe 2019, INEE, México: INEE. https://www.inee.edu.mx/medios/informe2019/stage_02/index.html,

Jara, C., Sánchez, M., Cox, C., y Montecinos, M. (2021). Socialización política y formación ciudadana en el contexto escolar chileno: un análisis desde el enfoque de género. Calidad en la educación(54). https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n54.932

Jebb, A., Ng, V., y Tay, L. (2021). A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019 . Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547

Kuhn, D., Feliciano, N., y Kostikina, D. (2019). Engaging Contemporary Issues as Practice for Citizenship. The Social Studies , 110(5), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2019.1625856

Kymlicka, W. (2003). La política vernácula: nacionalismo, multiculturalismo y ciudadanía. Paidós.

Lantia Intelligence. (2018). Mapa de riesgos Iztapalapa 2018, México. https://lantiaintelligence.com/storage/document/9/Mapa%20de%20riesgos%20Iztapalapa%202018,%20Lantia%20Intelligence.pdf

Larson, L., Cooper, C., Futch, S.,. . . y Takekawa, J. (2020). The diverse motivations of citizen scientists: Does conservation emphasis grow as volunteer participation progresses? Biological Conservation, 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108428

Lee, Y., y Schachter, H. (2019). Exploring the Relationship between Trust in Government and Citizen Participation. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1465956

María, L., Aliagas, C., y Rutten, K. (2022). Youth’s literary socialisation practices online: A systematic review of research. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100628

Matas, A. (2018). Diseño del formato de escalas tipo Likert: un estado de la cuestión. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 20(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1347

Mindus, P. (2014). Hacia una teoría funcionalista de la ciudadanía . Marcial Pons.

Narmaditya, B., y Wibowo, A. (2021). Family economic education, peer groups and students’ entrepreneurial intention: the mediating role of economic literacy. Heliyon, 7(4), e06692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06692

Neshkova, M., y Kalesnikaite, V. (2019). Corruption and citizen participation in local government: Evidence from Latin America. Governance, 32(4), 677-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12401

Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (México). (2021). Reporte Iztapalapa 2021. Enfoque de la gobernanza de la seguridad en los entornos urbanos para ciudades seguras, inclusivas y resilientes, México: Naciones Unidas.

Piaget, J. (1964). Seis Estudios de Psicología, España, Editorial Labor.

Piaget, J. (2014). Seis estudios de psicología. Labor.

Plan Nacional para la Evaluación de los aprendizajes (PLANEA). (2017). Resultados PLANEA México: SEP. http://168.255.121.151/PLANEA/Resultados2017/Basica2017/R17baCCTGeneral.aspx

Roche, J., Bell, L., Galvão, C.,. . . y Taraba, P. (2020). Citizen Science, Education, and Learning: Challenges and Opportunities. Frontiers in Sociology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.613814

Ruiz, A., y Herrera, M. (2021). El desafío de la formación ciudadana: reflexiones a partir de una experiencia de acompañamiento escolar. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 26. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782021260004

Saud, M. (2020). Civic engagement, youth socialisation and participation in public spheres in Indonesia. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105669

Schmidthuber, L., Piller, F., Bogers, M., y Hilgers, D. (2019). Citizen participation in public administration: investigating open government for social innovation. R&D Management, 49(3), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12365

Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP). (2011). Programas de estudio 2011 Guía Para El Maestro, Educación Básica Secundaria, Formación Cívica Y Ética, México: SEP.

Simonofski, A., Vallé, T., Serral, E., y Wautelet, Y. (2021). Investigating context factors in citizen participation strategies: A comparative analysis of Swedish and Belgian smart cities. International Journal of Information Management, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.007

Sistema de Información del Desarrollo Social (SIDESO). (s.f.). México: Secretaría de Inclusión y Bienestar Social. http://www.sideso.cdmx.gob.mx/index.php?id=63

Terriquez, V., Villegas, R., Villalobos, R., y Xu, J. (2020). The political socialization of Latinx youth in a conservative political context. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101188

Vygotsky, L. (2000). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Crítica.

Wahlund, M., y Palm, J. (2022). The role of energy democracy and energy citizenship for participatory energy transitions: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102482

Walker, D., Smigaj, M., y Tani, M. (2021). The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1488

Wamsler, C., Alkan-Olsson, J., Björn, H., . . . y Zelmerlow, F. (2020). Beyond participation: when citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. Climatic Change , 158, 235-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02557-9

Wehn, U., y Almomani, A. (2019). Incentives and barriers for participation in community-based environmental monitoring and information systems: A critical analysis and integration of the literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 341-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.09.002

Weiss, J. (2020). What Is Youth Political Participation? Literature Review on Youth Political Participation and Political Attitudes. Frontiers in Political Science, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.00001