Participation of the Mexican state in the protection of the rights of victims in the accusatory criminal justice system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2025500

Keywords:

Administration of justice, justice, law, penal sanctions, right to justice

Abstract

Introduction: The Mexican State assumes the constitutional responsibility of guaranteeing the pursuit, administration, and dispensation of justice, based on the imperatives of due process. The main objective of this research is to analyze the current regulatory framework that establishes comprehensive legal, medical, psychological, and other forms of protection and assistance for those who can prove their status as victims or injured parties. Methodology: Using a mixed methodological approach, qualitative analysis was employed to track and systematize theoretical evidence concerning compliance with the Mexican legal system. In addition, official quantitative research was integrated, specifically data derived from the National Survey on Victimization and Perception of Public Safety (ENVIPE) of the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), to empirically measure the phenomenon. Results: The study evaluates state performance in the effective implementation of reparations, critically examining the substantive effectiveness of the public policies implemented and the degree of compliance with the relevant legal provisions. The findings reveal persistent deficiencies in the practical assistance provided to victims or offended parties, identifying critical areas of opportunity for advancing the specialized professionalization of the public servants involved. Conclusions: As a fundamental conclusion, the study highlights the urgent need to implement ongoing awareness-raising and training processes with a victim-centered perspective for all personnel involved in the various stages of the process, in order to ensure empathetic treatment that is strictly in line with the full recognition of their fundamental rights.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. (1985). Declaración sobre los principios fundamentales de justicia para las víctimas de delitos y del abuso de poder. OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/es/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-basic-principles-justice-victims-crime-and-abuse

Carreón Perea, M. J. (2016). Un código para el México del siglo XXI. Ciudad de México, México. https://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2021/03/miscelaneas49541.pdf

Código Nacional de Procedimientos Penales (CNPP). (2024). Ciudad de México, México. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/cnpp.htm

Código Penal Federal. (2024). Ciudad de México, México. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/index.htm

Covarrubias Flores, H. H. (2014). Los derechos de la victima. IFDP: Revista del Instituto Federal de Defensa Pública, (18), 395-421. http://biblioteca.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r33522.pdf

Fikfak, V., & Izvorova, L. (2022). Language and Persuasion: Human Dignity at the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 22(3), ngac018. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac018

Illera Santos, M. D. J. (2022). Conflicto, derecho y mecanismos alternativos. Ius et Praxis, 28(1), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122022000100236

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2024). Encuesta nacional de victimización y percepción social de la seguridad ciudadana. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2024/ENVIPE/ENVIPE_24.pdf

Laguna Juárez, H. A. (2022). El acceso a la justicia en México: Entre la legalidad y la justicia por propia mano. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Penales, 5(17), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.57042/rmcp.v5i17.537

Ley General de Víctimas. (2024). Ciudad de México, México. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/index.htm

Martínez Mejía, M. N., & Martínez Mejía, F. E. (2022). Los colectivos de víctimas y el acceso a la justicia en México. Revista de Direito da Cidade, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.12957/rdc.2022.64700

Palazuelos Covarrubias, I., Zamora Saenz, I., & Aguirre Quezada, J. P. (2019). El Sistema de Justicia Penal en México.¿ En dónde estamos y hacia dónde vamos? http://bibliodigitalibd.senado.gob.mx/handle/123456789/4598

Pemberton, A., & Mulder, E. (2025). Bringing injustice back in: Secondary victimization as epistemic injustice. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 25(4), 1181–1200. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231181345

Reimbaevich, S. K. (2025). Issues of Developing the Adversarial Principle at The Pre-Trial Stage of Criminal Proceedings. International Journal of Law And Criminology, 5(5), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/Volume05Issue05-03

Schmidt, E. (2024). Los fundamentos teóricos y constitucionales del derecho procesal penal. Ediciones Olejnik.

Secretaría Técnica del Consejo de Coordinación para la implementación del sistema de justicia penal. (2014). Sistema penal acusatorio. Guía de bolsillo (Segunda edición ed.). San Luis Potosí, México.

Sucari Cruz, R. (2022). Las convenciones probatorias en el Código Procesal Penal: Dificultades para su aplicación en el sistema procesal penal peruano. REVISTA DE DERECHO, 7(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.47712/rd.2022.v7i1.170

Valenzuela Gastélum, L. A., Lugo Castro, T., & Martínez Cázarez, O. (2024). Derecho Penal Sustantivo y Adjetivo en México: Control social para la prevención y represión de conductas delictivas. Telos: Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 26(3), 1041-1054. https://doi.org/10.36390/telos263.16

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Valenzuela Gastélum, L. A. (2025). Participation of the Mexican state in the protection of the rights of victims in the accusatory criminal justice system. Región Científica, 4(2), 2025500. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2025500

Issue

Section

Scientific and technological research article