B-learning protocols for information literacy in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202373Keywords:
educational autonomy, computer-assisted teaching, teaching and training, educational management, professional trainingAbstract
The present study arises from the achievements accomplished by a transdisciplinary research team involved in a project focusing on essential protocols for virtual education. Employing a mixed-methodological approach, integrated across different phases of the study, it is suggested that skills training, digital literacy, and learning autonomy should be priority factors in teaching undergraduate Engineering programs. Furthermore, by contrasting current findings with previous studies, the need to drive curricular changes through virtual learning in a B-learning format is reaffirmed. In the same context, the influence of a curricular innovation protocol centered on literacy skills, digital literacy, autonomy, and critical thinking was explored, following the guidelines for the training of engineers established by the Federal Council of Deans of Engineering of Argentina.
Metrics
References
Abumandour, E.(2021). Public libraries' role in supporting e-learning and spreading lifelong education: a case study. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(2), 178-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-06-2019-0063
Anthony Jr, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A., Phon, D., Abdullah, A., . . . Baba, S. (2019). Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3433–3466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09941-z
Bauman, Z. (2005). Ética posmoderna. Siglo XXI.
Bruggeman, B., Tondeur, J., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., Garone, A., y Vanslambrouck, S. (2021). Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 48, 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772
Cassany, D. (2019). Laboratorio lector: para entender la lectura. Editorial Anagrama.
Cassany, D. (2021). El arte de dar clase (según un lingüista). Editorial Anagrama.
Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2523-2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
Dai, M., Qi, W., Chen, X. y Liao, M. (2022). Application and exploration of blended learning with BOPPPS teaching model in a veterinary infectious diseases course. Journal of Biological Education, 45, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2120904
Geng, S., Law, K. y Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
Hellinger, B. (2010). Plenitud: la mirada del Nahual. Grupo CUDEC (Centro Universitario Doctor Emilio Cárdenas).
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends, 69, 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
Hunt, I., Power, J., Young, K. y Ryan, A. (2023). Optimising industry learners’ online experiences – lessons for a post-pandemic world. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(2), 358-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2112553
Ibrahim, M. y Nat, M. (2019). Blended learning motivation model for instructors in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0145-2
Korson, C. (2022). A place-based approach to blended learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2022.2122032
Kundu, A., Bej, T. y Rice, M. (2021). Time to engage: Implementing math and literacy blended learning routines in an Indian elementary classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1201–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10306-0
Lapitan Jr., L., Tiangco, C., Sumalinog, D., Sabarillo, N. y Diaz, J. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
Neroni, J., Meijs, C., Gijselaers, H., Kirschner, P. y de Groot, R. (2019). Learning strategies and academic performance in distance education. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.007
Perazzoli, S., de Santana, J. y Barreto, M. (2022). Systematic analysis of constellation-based techniques by using Natural Language Processing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121674
Power, J. y Tanner, D. (2023). Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: an examination of feasibility and reliability. European Journal of Engineering Education, 615-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2185769
Prifti, R. (2022). Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 37(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1755642
Rasheed, R., Kamsin, A. y Abdullah, N. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Rathnayaka, M., Ganapathi, J., Kickbusch, S., Dawes, L. y Brown, R. (2023). Preparative pre-laboratory online resources for effectively managing cognitive load of engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2204813
Reig, D. (2020). La sociedad de la hiperconectividad: tendencias, claves y miradas. Fundación Encuentro.
Smith, K. y Hill, J. (2019). Defining the nature of blended learning through its depiction in current research. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1517732
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R. y Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w
West, H., Hill, J., Abzhaparova, A., Cox, W. y Alexander, A. (2023). Pandemic pedagogies: reflecting on online learning using the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2023.2190962
Yin, B., & Yuan, C. (2022). Blended learning performance influence mechanism based on community of inquiry. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2061912
Zhang, Z., Cao, T., Shu, J. y Liu, H. (2022). Identifying key factors affecting college students’ adoption of the e-learning system in mandatory blended learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1388-1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1723113
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cristina Laplagne Sarmiento, José Javier Urnicia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Este artículo se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative CommonsReconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. A menos que se indique lo contrario, el material publicado asociado se distribuye bajo la misma licencia.
