Design and implementation of a game-based activity to promote learning of game theory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2023117

Keywords:

playful activity, design thinking, Nash equilibrium, dominant and dominated strategies, game theory

Abstract

Game theory, an interdisciplinary field that explores interactions among entities in strategic scenarios, is paramount for understanding how individuals make decisions in interactive situations. This paper outlines the development and evaluation of a playful exercise to facilitate understanding fundamental concepts such as dominant and dominated strategies and Nash equilibrium, employing a 'design thinking' methodology. An empirical evaluation was conducted with 76 Industrial Engineering students from the Universidad Industrial de Santander, dividing them into four teams representing companies vying for customers. The teams assessed payoff matrices and made marketing decisions, utilizing a colored die to eliminate non-advantageous strategies. Findings indicate a significant increase in interest in game theory, with 86% of participants expressing a preference for this method compared to conventional classes. Furthermore, 81% desired to incorporate this activity into their regular courses, while 76% applied previous knowledge during the training. An average improvement of 17% in correct responses suggests that the playful exercise effectively facilitates the assimilation of key concepts in game theory among university students. This study underscores the potential of integrating active activities based on game theory to enrich the learning process in an academic context.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ahmad, F., Almarri, O., Shah, Z. y Al-Fagih, L. (2023). Game theory applications in traffic management: A review of authority-based travel modelling. Travel Behaviour and Society, 32, 100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100585

Ahmad, F., Shah, Z. y Al-Fagih, L. (2023). Applications of evolutionary game theory in urban road transport network: A state of the art review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 98, 104791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104791

Amorós, P. (2022). Implementation in dominant strategies of quota rules to choose one candidate. Economics Letters, 216, 110557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110557

Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD research, 1(1), 19.

Bonsón, E., Bednárová, M. y Perea, D. (2023). Disclosures about algorithmic decision making in the corporate reports of Western European companies. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 48, 100596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100596

Cechella, F., Abbad, G. y Wagner, R. (2021). Leveraging learning with gamification: An experimental case study with bank managers. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100044

Cullen, A., Alpcan, T. y Kalloniatis, A. (2022). Adversarial decisions on complex dynamical systems using game theory. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 594, 126998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.126998

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. y Nacke, L. (2011). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining “Gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, Tampere, Finland. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Do, J. (2022). Cheating and compensation in price-fixing cartels. Journal of Economic Theory, 200, 105382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2021.105382

Hafezalkotob, A., Nersesian, L. y Fardi, K. (2023). A policy-making model for evolutionary SME behavior during a pandemic recession supported on game theory approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 177, 108975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108975

Hallinger, P. y Wang, R. (2020). Analyzing the intellectual structure of research on simulation-based learning in management education, 1960–2019: A bibliometric review. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 100418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100418

Hou, F., Zhai, Y. y You, X. (2020). An equilibrium in group decision and its association with the Nash equilibrium in game theory. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106138

Jain, L., Katarya, R. y Sachdeva, S. (2020). Recognition of opinion leaders coalitions in online social network using game theory. Knowledge-Based Systems, 203, 106158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106158

Liu, Y. (2021). E-commerce Price War Based on Game Theory. 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021), https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211209.533

Loertscher, S. y Marx, L. (2020). A dominant-strategy asset market mechanism. Games and Economic Behavior, 120, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2019.12.001

Mehmanpazir, F., Khalili-Damghani, K. y Hafezalkotob, A. (2022). Dynamic strategic planning: A hybrid approach based on logarithmic regression, system dynamics, Game Theory and Fuzzy Inference System (Case study Steel Industry). Resources Policy, 77, 102769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102769

Mohamed, H., Mirakhor, A. y Erbaş, S. (2019). Chapter 3 - Game Theory and Human Behaviour. In H. Mohamed, A. Mirakhor, & S. N. Erbaş (Eds.), Belief and Rule Compliance (pp. 43-68). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813809-0.00003-5

Munhoz, C. (2020). Gamifying Portuguese Language Learning: A Case Study Examining a Quest-Based Website to Prompt Oral Production and Interaction in Learners of Portuguese L2. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 20, 733-760. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398202016396

Murphy, M. (2016). Design Thinking. In Landscape Architecture Theory (pp. 263–277). Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-751-3_10

Nash, J. y John, F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 36(1), 48-49. https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.36.1.48

Ozkan-Canbolat, E., Beraha, A. y Bas, A. (2016). Application of Evolutionary Game Theory to Strategic Innovation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 685-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.069

Palacio, L. y Cortés, A. (2020). Conflicto 2x2: una lección de teoría de juegos en el laboratorio”. Cuadernos Económicos ICE, 99, 171-190. http://doi.org/10.32796/cice.2020.99.7013

Reyes, Y., Cañizares, R., Vargas, K. y García, M. (2020). Estudio de los principales beneficios del uso de la Gamificación en las plataformas educativas. Serie Científica de la Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas, 13(6), 158-178. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8590288

Rzeczycki, A. (2022). Supply chain decision making with use of game theory. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 3988-3997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.461

Sabino, C. (2014). El proceso de investigación. Editorial Episteme.

Seymour, A., Borggren, M. y Baker, R. (2023). Escape the Monotony: Gamification Enhances Nursing Education. Journal of Emergency Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2023.06.004

Shi, Z., Zhou, H., Laat, C. y Zhao, Z. (2022). A Bayesian game-enhanced auction model for federated cloud services using blockchain. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., 136, 49–66. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.05.017

Suárez-López, M., Blanco-Marigorta, A. y Gutiérrez-Trashorras, A. (2023). Gamification in thermal engineering: Does it encourage motivation and learning? Education for Chemical Engineers, 45, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2023.07.006

Sun, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Yu, R. y Cao, D. (2021). Cross-layer tradeoff of QoS and security in Vehicular ad hoc Networks: A game theoretical approach. Computer Networks, 192, 108031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108031

Tarifa, E., Argañaraz, J., Astorga, F., Martínez, J. y Erdmann, E. (2011). Teoría de juegos aplicada a las políticas públicas. Strateg. Manag. Bus. Rev., 2(1), 25–37. http://www.exeedu.com/publishing.cl/strategy_manag_bus_rev/2011/Vol2/3-SM08-11-full.pdf

Tasnim, S., Sarimuthu, C., Lan, B. y Tan, C. (2023). A game theory approach for OLTC voltage control operation in an active distribution network. Electric Power Systems Research, 214, 108861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108861

Valle, G. (2019). “LOS DOMINADOS Y EL ARTE DE LA RESISTENCIA”. UNA RESEÑA DE JAMES C, SCOTT. Revista Chakiñan de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, (7), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.07.08

Vanda, S., Nikoo, M., Hashempour, P., Al-Wardy, M., Franklin, J., Šimůnek, J. y Gandomi, A. (2022). Reservoir operation under accidental MTBE pollution: A graph-based conflict resolution framework considering spatial-temporal-quantitative uncertainties. Journal of Hydrology, 605, 127313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127313

Wang, J., Wang, D., Li, X. y Qiao, J. (2023). Dichotomy value iteration with parallel learning design towards discrete-time zero-sum games. Neural Networks, 167, 751-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2023.09.009

Wu, D. y Lisser, A. (2022). Using CNN for solving two-player zero-sum games. Expert Systems with Applications, 204, 117545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117545

Wu, D. y Lisser, A. (2023). Improved saddle point prediction in stochastic two-player zero-sum games with a deep learning approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 126, 106664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106664

Zeng, X., Gao, H., Chen, Z., Yang, D. y Song, D. (2023). Cooperative optimization of speed planning and energy management for hybrid electric vehicles based on Nash equilibrium. Journal of Power Sources, 571, 233070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233070

Published

2023-07-04

How to Cite

Ardila Otero, C. F., Pérez Rueda, L. V., Ballesteros Peña, M. C., & Torres-Barreto, M. L. (2023). Design and implementation of a game-based activity to promote learning of game theory. Región Científica, 2(2), 2023117. https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2023117

Issue

Section

Scientific and technological research article