Opciones Reales y su aplicación en proyectos de energía renovable. Revisión de estado del arte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58763/rc202349Palabras clave:
energía renovable, incertidumbre, inversión, opciones reales, simulaciónResumen
El uso de fuentes de energía renovables, como la energía eólica, solar, entre otras, viene en crecimiento, especialmente los últimos años. El objetivo principal del presente estudio consistió en una revisión de literatura sobre enfoque de opciones reales para la evaluación de la viabilidad de invertir en la producción de energías y sus derivados. Se analizaron treinta publicaciones con la temática mencionada, contenidas en el gestor bibliográfico Mendeley Reference Manager, que fueron categorizadas de acuerdo a su propósito en siete grupos: 1) Evaluación del proyecto o inversión de generación de energía renovable, 2) Evaluación del proyecto o inversión de generación de energía no renovable, 3) Evaluación de subastas de energía, carteras e inversiones en el mercado de energía, 4) Evaluación de tecnologías de energía renovable, 5) Evaluación del impacto de la políticas de regulación en proyectos de energía renovable, 6) Evaluación de la transición a generación de energía renovable y 7) Evaluación del diseño, tamaño y ubicación de parques eólicos. Se identificaron nueve tipos de opciones: 1) Esperar, 2) Retrasar, 3) Anticipar, 4) Ampliar, 5) Ejercer, 6) Rechazar, 7) Abandonar, 8) Expandir y 9) Conmutar. Además, se las auscultaron las técnicas y modelos aplicados para evaluar la opción y simular las veintinueve incertidumbres, agrupadas en ocho categorías, consideradas en las investigaciones. En el futuro, se requiere aumentar los estudios con enfoque de opciones reales para evaluar proyectos de energía renovable, bajo incertidumbres, aplicando nuevas técnicas de evaluación, que permita valorar y establecer estrategias flexibles.
Métricas
Citas
Agaton, C. y Karl, H. (2019). A real options approach to renewable electricity generation in the Philippines. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-017-0143-y
Assereto, M. y Byrne, J. (2021). No real option for solar in Ireland: A real option valuation of utility scale solar investment in Ireland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110892
Attoh-Okine, N. y Ayyub, B. (2005). Applied research in uncertainty modeling and analysis. Springer.
Balibrea-Iniesta, J. (2020). Economic analysis of renewable energy regulation in France: A case study for photovoltaic plants based on real options. Energies, 13(11), 27-60. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112760
Bednyagin, D. y Gnansounou, E. (2011). Real options valuation of fusion energy R&D programme. Energy Policy, 39(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.019
Biggins, F., Kataria, M., Roberts, D., y Brown, D. (2022). Green hydrogen investments: Investigating the option to wait. Energy, 241, 122842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122842
Black, F. y Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062
Burke, M. y Stephens, J. (2018). Energy Research & Social Science Political power and renewable energy futures : A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
Castellini, M., Menoncin, F., Moretto, M. y Vergalli, S. (2021). Photovoltaic Smart Grids in the prosumers investment decisions: a real option model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 126, 103988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103988
Chen, S., Zhang, Q., Li, H., Mclellan, B., Zhang, T. y Tan, Z. (2019). Investment decision on shallow geothermal heating & cooling based on compound options model: A case study of China. Applied Energy, 254, 113655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113655
Chen, W., Zeng, Y. y Xu, C. (2019). Energy storage subsidy estimation for microgrid: A real option game- theoretic approach. Applied Energy, 239, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.232
Conejo, A., Carrión, M. y Morales, J. (2010). Decision making under uncertainty in electricity markets (Vol. 1). Springer.
Copeland, T. y Antikarov, V. (2001). Real options (Issue BOOK). Texere New York.
Das Gupta, S. (2021). Using real options to value capacity additions and investment expenditures in renewable energies in India. Energy Policy, 148, 111916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111916
Delapedra-Silva, V., Ferreira, P., Cunha, J. y Kimura, H. (2021). Economic evaluation of wind power projects in a mix of free and regulated market environments in brazil. Energies, 14(11), 3325. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113325
Deutch, J. (2017). Decoupling Economic Growth and Carbon Emissions. Joule, 1(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.011
Di Bari, A. (2020). A real options approach to valuate solar energy investment with public authority incentives: The Italian case. Energies, 13(6), 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13164181
Dixit, R. y Pindyck, R. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton university press.
Fan, J., Wei, S., Zhang, X. y Yang, L. (2020). A comparison of the regional investment benefits of CCS retrofitting of coal-fired power plants and renewable power generation projects in China. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 92, 102858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102858
Gazheli, A. y Bergh, J. (2018). Real options analysis of investment in solar vs. wind energy: Diversification strategies under uncertain prices and costs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 2693–2704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.096
Guo, K. y Zhang, L. (2020). Guarantee optimization in energy performance contracting with real option analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120908
Guo, K., Zhang, L., y Wang, T. (2019). Optimal scheme in energy performance contracting under uncertainty: A real option perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.218
Harjanne, A. y Korhonen, J. (2019). Abandoning the concept of renewable energy. Energy Policy, 127, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.029
Hedman, K. y Sheblé, G.(2006). Comparing hedging methods for wind power: Using pumped storage hydro units vs. options purchasing. 2006 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems, 1–6.
Henao, A., Sauma, E. y Gonzalez, A. (2018). Impact of introducing flexibility in the Colombian transmission expansion planning. Energy, 157, 131–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.143
Hörnlein, L. (2019). The value of gas-fired power plants in markets with high shares of renewable energy: A real options application. Energy Economics, 81, 1078–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.04.013
Isaza, F., Arredondo-Orozco, C. y Marenco-Maldonado, G. (2021). Photovoltaic power purchase agreement valuation under real options approach. Renewable Energy Focus, 36, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2020.12.006
Kim, K., Lee, D. y An, D. (2020). Real option valuation of the R&D investment in renewable energy considering the effects of the carbon emission trading market: A Korean case. Energies, 13(3), 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13030622
Kitzing, L., Juul, N., Drud, M., y Krogh, T. (2016). A real options approach to analyse wind energy investments under different support schemes. Applied Energy, 188, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.104
Kordmahaleh, A., Naghashzadegan, M., Javaherdeh, K. y Khoshgoftar, M. (2017). Design of a 25 MWe Solar Thermal Power Plant in Iran with Using Parabolic Trough Collectors and a Two-Tank Molten Salt Storage System. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2017, 4210184. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4210184
Lee, S., y Shih, L. (2011). Enhancing renewable and sustainable energy development based on an options-based policy evaluation framework: case study of wind energy technology in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(5), 2185–2198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.011
Lehne, K. (2019). Informe especial: Emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero en la UE: Se notifican correctamente, pero es necesario tener un mayor conocimiento de las futuras reducciones. https://www.eca.europa.eu/es/publications?did=51834
Liu, X. y Ronn, E. (2020). Using the binomial model for the valuation of real options in computing optimal subsidies for Chinese renewable energy investments. Energy Economics, 87, 104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104692
Liu, Y., Zheng, R., Chen, S. y Yuan, J. (2019). The economy of wind-integrated-energy-storage projects in China’s upcoming power market: A real options approach. Resources Policy, 63, 101434.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101434
Locatelli, G., Mancini, M. y Lotti, G. (2020). A simple-to-implement real options method for the energy sector. Energy, 197, 117226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117226
Ma, R., Cai, H., Ji, Q. y Zhai, P. (2021). The impact of feed-in tariff degression on R&D investment in renewable energy: The case of the solar PV industry. Energy Policy, 151, 112209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112209
Martínez, E., Mutale, J. y Rivas-Dávalos, F. (2013). Real options theory applied to electricity generation projects: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.059
Maya, C., Hernández, J. y Gallego, Ó. (2012). La valoración de proyectos de energía eólica en Colombia bajo el enfoque de opciones reales. Cuadernos de Administración, 25(44), 193-231.
Méndez, M., Goyanes, A. y Lamothe, P. (2009). Real Options Valuation of a Wind Farm. February. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2708351
Mentis, D., Howells, M., Rogner, H., Korkovelos, A. y Arderne, C. (2017). Lighting the World : the first application of an open source , spatial electrification tool (OnSSET) on Sub-Saharan Africa Lighting the World : the first application of an open source, spatial electrification tool (OnSSET) on Sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Research Letters, 12(8), 085003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7b29
Moon, S. y Lee, D. (2019). An optimal electric vehicle investment model for consumers using total cost of ownership: A real option approach. Renewable Energy, 253, 113494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113494
Murgas, B., Henao, A. y Guzmán, L. (2021). Evaluation of Investments in Wind Energy Projects, under Uncertainty. State of the Art Review. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10213.https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110213
Najafi, P. y Talebi, S. (2021). Using real options model based on Monte-Carlo Least-Squares for economic appraisal of flexibility for electricity generation with VVER-1000 in developing countries. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, 101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101508
Nunes, L., Lima, M., Davison, M. y Leite, A. (2021). Switch and defer option in renewable energy projects: Evidences from Brazil. Energy, 231, 120972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120972
Ofori, C., Bokpin, G., Aboagye, A. y Afful-Dadzie, A. (2021). A real options approach to investment timing decisions in utility-scale renewable energy in Ghana. Energy, 235, 121366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121366
Penizzotto, F., Pringles, R., y Olsina, F. (2019). Real options valuation of photovoltaic power investments in existing buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 114, 109308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109308
Pindyck, R. (1984). Uncertainty in the theory of renewable resource markets. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(2), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297693
Pringles, R., Olsina, F. y Penizzotto, F. (2020). Valuation of defer and relocation options in photovoltaic generation investments by a stochastic simulation-based method. Renewable Energy, 151, 846–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.082
Ríos, D., Blanco, G., y Olsina, F. (2019). Integrating Real Options Analysis with long-term electricity market models. Energy Economics, 80, 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.023
Santos, L., Soares, I., Mendes, C. y Ferreira, P. (2014). Real options versus traditional methods to assess renewable energy projects. Renewable Energy, 68, 588–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.038
Siddiqui, A., Marnay, C. y Wiser, R. (2007). Real options valuation of US federal renewable energy research, development, demonstration, and deployment. Energy Policy, 35(1), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.019
Trigeorgis, L. (1993). Real options and interactions with financial flexibility. Financial Management, 22(3), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665939
Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. MIT press.
Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética – UPME. (2022). Informe de Registro de Proyectos de Generación Inscripción según requisitos de las Resoluciones UPME No. 0520, No. 0638 de 2007 y No. 0143. 0520. https://www1.upme.gov.co/Paginas/Registro.aspx
Yang, Z., Gao, C. y Zhao, M. (2020). The Optimal Investment Strategy of P2G Based on Real Option Theory. IEEE Access, 8, 127156–127166. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2910259
Yu, W., Sheblé, G., Lopes, J. y Matos, M. (2006). Valuation of switchable tariff for wind energy. Electric Power Systems Research, 76(5), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2005.09.004
Zambujal-Oliveira, J. (2013). Investments in combined cycle natural gas-fired systems: A real options analysis. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 49, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.11.015
Zhang, M., Wang, Q., Zhou, D. y Ding, H. (2019). Evaluating uncertain investment decisions in low-carbon transition toward renewable energy. Applied Energy, 240, 1049–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.205
Zhu, L., Li, L., y Su, B. (2021). The price-bidding strategy for investors in a renewable auction: An option games–based study. Energy Economics, 100, 105331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105331
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Benjamín Murgas Téllez, Alvin Arturo Henao-Pérez, Luceny Guzmán Acuña
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Este artículo se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative CommonsReconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. A menos que se indique lo contrario, el material publicado asociado se distribuye bajo la misma licencia.