El fortalecimiento de la identidad rural a través del design thinking y su aporte a los ODS

Jasleidy Astrid Prada Segura; Samir Alveiro Medina Roncancio; José Samuel González Contreras

doi:10.58763/rc2024297

Autores/as

Jasleidy Astrid Prada Segura Corporación Unificada Nacional de Educación Superior. Bogotá, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6130-461X
Samir Alveiro Medina Roncancio Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje. Bogotá, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5690-1129
José Samuel González Contreras Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje. Bogotá, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0855-0440

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2024297

Palabras clave:

Educación ambiental, educación para el desarrollo sostenible, diseño de proyecto, identidad cultural

Resumen

La transformación de los contextos rurales reclama estrategias innovadoras que combinen factores endógenos y exógenos, de cara a lograr una gestión sostenible de los recursos y el crecimiento sostenible. Además, esta integración debe responder a la identidad cultural y los saberes ancestrales de las comunidades, tomar en consideración sus perspectivas y proyectar el papel de las próximas generaciones. Se condujo un estudio mixto secuencial dirigido al diagnóstico de los elementos sociodemográficos, conceptuales y prácticos necesarios para implementar una metodología de design thinking, con el objetivo de fortalecer la identidad rural en Colombia. Los resultados indican que es preciso sensibilizar a los jóvenes y propiciar su entrenamiento como líderes transformadores capaces de dinamizar procesos de design thinking. Además, se ofrecen principios para el adecuado desarrollo de dicho entrenamiento y del diseño de una metodología. Los hallazgos permitieron concluir que enfoques participativos y centrados en las comunidades podrían resultar los más aptos para el fortalecimiento de la identidad y la consiguiente transformación rural.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Acosta, N., y Fold, N. (2022). The coloniality of power on the green frontier: Commodities and violent territorialisation in Colombia’s Amazon. Geoforum, 128, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.11.025

Antony, J., Sony, M., y McDermott, O. (2023). Conceptualizing Industry 4.0 readiness model dimensions: An exploratory sequential mixed-method study. The TQM Journal, 35(2), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2021-0180

Baldo, E., Mahlmann, L., Hackenhaar, A., … y Witczak, M. (2023). Integration of Industry 4.0 technologies with Education 4.0: Advantages for improvements in learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 20(2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2021-0201

Banerjee, S., Dos Santos, L., y Hulgård, L. (2023). >Intersectional knowledge as rural social innovation. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.007

Barbier, E. (2020). Is green rural transformation possible in developing countries? World Development, 131, 104955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104955

Bartoloni, S., Calò, E., Marinelli, L., … y Gregori, G. (2022). Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new Quintuple Helix - Design Thinking approach to technology. Technovation, 113, 102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102413

Braun, V., y Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196

Chiarini, A., y Kumar, M. (2022). What is Quality 4.0? An exploratory sequential mixed methods study of Italian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 60(16), 4890–4910. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1942285

Davelaar, D. (2021). Transformation for sustainability: A deep leverage points approach. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 727–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00872-0

Fabiano, E., Schulz, C., y Martín, M. (2021). Wetland spirits and indigenous knowledge: Implications for the conservation of wetlands in the Peruvian Amazon. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 100107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100107

Fahmi, F., y Sari, I. (2020). Rural transformation, digitalisation and subjective wellbeing: A case study from Indonesia. Habitat International, 98, 102150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102150

Fernández-Llamazares, Á., y Virtanen, P. (2020). Game masters and Amazonian Indigenous views on sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.004

Guáqueta-Solórzano, V., y Postigo, J. (2022). Indigenous perceptions and adaptive responses to the impacts of climate variability in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Frontiers in Climate, 4, 910294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.910294

Hoolohan, C., y Browne, A. (2020). Design thinking for practice-based intervention: Co-producing the change points toolkit to unlock (un)sustainable practices. Design Studies, 67, 102–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.12.002

Laakso, S., Aro, R., Heiskanen, E., y Kaljonen, M. (2021). Reconfigurations in sustainability transitions: A systematic and critical review. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1836921

López-Quiñones, A., Martinez-Lopez, M., Moreno, C., … y Flores-Reyes, E. (2023). Ancestral Computing for Sustainability: Centering Indigenous Epistemologies in Researching Computer Science Education. TechTrends, 67(3), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00820-y

Ma, X., Wang, R., Dai, M., y Ou, Y. (2021). The influence of culture on the sustainable livelihoods of households in rural tourism destinations. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(8), 1235–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1826497

Ma, Z., Ran, R., y Xu, D. (2023). The Effect of Peasants Differentiation on Peasants’ Willingness and Behavior Transformation of Land Transfer: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China. Land, 12(2), 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020338

Manosalvas, R., Hoogesteger, J., y Boelens, R. (2023). Imaginaries of place in territorialization processes: Transforming the Oyacachi páramos through nature conservation and water transfers in the Ecuadorian highlands. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(5), 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544231168050

Marchant, C., Rodríguez, P., Morales-Salinas, L., Paz, L., y Ortega, L. (2021). Practices and Strategies for Adaptation to Climate Variability in Family Farming. An Analysis of Cases of Rural Communities in the Andes Mountains of Colombia and Chile. Agriculture, 11(11), 1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11111096

Mardero, S., Schmook, B., Calmé, S., … y Castelar, J. (2023). Traditional knowledge for climate change adaptation in Mesoamerica: A systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100473

McIlfatrick, S., Slater, P., Beck, E., … y Hasson, F. (2021). Examining public knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards palliative care: A mixed method sequential study. BMC Palliative Care, 20(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00730-5

Mills-Novoa, M., Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., y Vos, J. (2023). Resisting, leveraging, and reworking climate change adaptation projects from below: Placing adaptation in Ecuador’s agrarian struggle. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(6), 2283–2311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2144252

Moriña, A. (2021). When people matter: The ethics of qualitative research in the health and social sciences. Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), 1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13221

Nakata, C., y Hwang, J. (2020). Design thinking for innovation: Composition, consequence, and contingency. Journal of Business Research, 118, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.038

Naumann, M., y Rudolph, D. (2020). Conceptualizing rural energy transitions: Energizing rural studies, ruralizing energy research. Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.011

Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., y Corbett, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102104

Pande, M., y Bharathi, S. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637

Postigo, J., Guáqueta-Solórzano, V., Castañeda, E., y Ortiz-Guerrero, C. (2024). Adaptive Responses and Resilience of Small Livestock Producers to Climate Variability in the Cruz Verde-Sumapaz Páramo, Colombia. Land, 13(4), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040499

Ramirez, A., y Inga, E. (2022). Educational Innovation in Adult Learning Considering Digital Transformation for Social Inclusion. Education Sciences, 12(12), 882. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120882

Schmidt, M., Ikpeng, Y., Kayabi, T., … y Adams, C. (2021). Indigenous Knowledge and Forest Succession Management in the Brazilian Amazon: Contributions to Reforestation of Degraded Areas. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4, 605925. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.605925

Simeon, M., Samsudin, M., y Yakob, N. (2022). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09601-1

Taquette, S., y Borges, L. (2022). Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: A Critical Literature Review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 160940692210787. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221078731

Trivelli, C., y Morel, J. (2021). Rural Youth Inclusion, Empowerment, and Participation. The Journal of Development Studies, 57(4), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2020.1808194

Tym, C. (2024). Indigenous Knowledge and Ontological Difference? Ontological Pluralism, Secular Public Reason, and Knowledge between Indigenous Amazonia and the West. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 66(2), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417523000440

Zang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Woods, M., y Fois, F. (2020). Rural decline or restructuring? Implications for sustainability transitions in rural China. Land Use Policy, 94, 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104531

Zhang, F., Ayoungman, F., y Islam, S. (2024). Institutional Capital, Ancestral Hall, and the Reshaping of Ancient Rule: An Empirical Analysis of the New Energy of Chinese Heritage Elements in Rural Revitalization. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 2726–2760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01243-7